[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>That is not correct. "Draft Postel" was a *draft*, and Postel and
>ISOC both knew very well what that meant. ISOC's "endorsement"
>said "this is a nice first thought, let's go work on it."
Postel told me, in a face-to-face meeting, that the second draft
be an RFC, it was where he wanted it, and he was having Bill Manning
clean it up for submission. Bill confirmed that 2 days later.
>The prime reason that the MoU was not implemented was the
>intervention of Magaziner. In my opinion the definitive
>intervention of Magaziner was at a meeting at the IETF in Washington
>DC where the insertion of the 7 new TLDs was proposed as a testbed,
>and Magaziner said "no". Up to that time the MoU was the game in
You really believe that, even now? No, I don't think you do.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
Comment: Signed and Encrypted EMail preferred. Fnord.
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----