[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] new TLDs

To: "'Dave Crocker'" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, "'Milton Mueller'" <mueller@syr.edu>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 16:39:55 -0800
Cc: "'wgc'" <wg-c@dnso.org>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.19991223153324.00ccf150@mail.bayarea.net>
Reply-To: <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


> In this case, it is significant that you do not address the
> potential legal
> impact of letting a registry define TLDs.
>
> As to precedent, please tell us what registry has previously
> been allowed
> to define a new TLD (and then administer it.)

.web at <http://webtld.com> or, for those that have a complete root-zone,
<http://webtld.web>


I have trouble with the use of your word "allow". It seems misplaced.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] new TLDs
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread