Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

On 21-Dec-1999 Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
> Proposed TLD - .anon
> Restriction - may not be used to offer goods or services.  unverifiable
> contact info is not grounds for de-registration
> Registrars - same as above
> Register- same as above


Why impose such a restriction?  What is the basis?  Isn't it up to the buyer to
decide if they want to do business with an entity under such a domain?

I find restrictions like this to be arbitrary and without any real solid basis.


As to the rest of your suggestions, I see you trying to turn the DNS into some
sort of certification authority.  I would never support such a proposal.
 

--
William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192