[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Final Report

    I should add that like Milton, I assume this is an issue of bad
phrasing, and can be easily corrected.     Jamie

On Mon, 15 May 2000, James Love wrote:
> I agree with Milton that it is quite unfair to suggest there is *any*
> support for the IPC proposal in the NCDNHC.  Jamie
> On Mon, 15 May 2000, Milton Mueller wrote:
> > This is misleading. The preponderance of opinion in the non-commercial
> > constituency is against BOTH a list AND sunrise plus anything. Your
> > statement implies that the constituency supports sunrise. It most
> > emphatically does not. If, as I suspect, this implication arises only from
> > bad phrasing, it could be easily corrected.

James Love, Consumer Project on Technology    
P.O. Box 19367        | http://www.cptech.org 
Washington, DC 20036  | love@cptech.org       
Voice 202/387-8030    | Fax 202/234-5176