[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-b] Point of Clarification
I've just begun to read your paper and will provide INTA's comments as soon
as possible. At this time, however, I do want to thank you for taking on
the arduous task of heading up WG-B. You're doing a fine job.
From: Michael D. Palage [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 10:18 AM
Subject: [wg-b] Point of Clarification
Just so that there is no confusion. The position paper that I posted was my
PERSONAL viewpoints and they DO NOT represent the official viewpoint of the
group. That being said, I have spend approximately 20 hours on the phone
speaking to various factions of the Working Group B community over the last
couple of weeks, and I believe this paper can be a STARTING point on the
final road to consensus.
Up until now as de facto sole chair of the Working Group I have attempted to
take a neutral standpoint, but as Harald stated to the list earlier this
week, there was really no movement from either side toward a central ground.
As Co-Chair I thought it my responsibility to attempt such a peace offering.
I contemplate an approximately three to four week group comment period on
these proposals before moving forward with the drafting of any type of
"OFFICAL" Working Group B Statement. Sorry for any confusion, but I had
already exceeded the 24 hour mark without sleep at the time of
Thanks again for everyone's feedback.