[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-b] Re: Nature of answer to question B
What if the counties of "Contra Costa" and "Alameda" wanted to start a TLD
registry with the EBAY TLD? Chartered, according to my WG-C proposal, to
register organizations headquartered in the East SF Bay Area? Is that an
infringement? Further, even if it was, would it be actionable under US law?
I believe that copyrights, patents, and other marks, are not binding for
governmental entities (USG can violate copyright/patent anytime it wants to,
I realize that this may be a corner case, but it's not that unlikely a
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
> Martin B. Schwimmer
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 12:38 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [wg-b] Re: Nature of answer to question B
> >- All suggested mechanisms that ICANN could implement to
> protect famous marks
> > are either ineffective or harmful to the development of
> commercial and
> > non-commercial use of the Internet
> Why would the exclusion of third-party registration of
> kodak.firm from the
> .firm TLD be ineffective in protecting the KODAK mark?
> Why would the prohibition of third-party registration of ebay.firm be
> harmful to the development of commercial use of the Internet?
> It seems as
> if the ability of the consumer to trust the fact that ebay.firm or
> kodak.biz were associated with the owners of those famous
> trademarks would
> aid, not hinder commercial use of the Internet.
> >- UDRP will significantly reduce the cost to the "famous
> mark" holders of
> > protecting their marks against clear cases of cyberpiracy
> compared to
> > the curent situation
> Is your goal to increase the cost?
> >- A few more years of discussion in non-Internet fora about
> how to decide
> > what marks are internationally famous or not is likely to lead to
> > conclusions, and ICANN should not attempt to guess at
> these conclusions
> > at the present time; doing so might even harm, delay or bias the
> > non-Internet process for reaching conclusions in this matter.
> Red herring.
> @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @