Re: Perplexed in the Face of Anger, Acrimony & ~Evidence

["Teddy A. Purwadi" <policy@iix.net.id>]

All,
Commercial/Non-Commercial, and/or
Profit/Non-Profit organizations,
are thin layers to be understandable.

I have a good book, title:
"Financial Planning for Non-Profit Organization "
by Jody Blazek
Publisher:John Willey & Son Inc.
ISBN:0-471-12589-x
Edition: 1996

For me,
This is a good guidance to make financial reports.

-teddy
http://www.mii.or.id
http://www.iix.net.id 

At 05:24 03/06/99 GMT, William X. Walsh wrote:
>On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 01:26:23 +0200, Onno Hovers <onno@SURFER.XS4ALL.NL>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <4.2.0.56.19990602154355.00acbdd0@mail.bayarea.net> you wrote:
>>>At 02:37 PM 6/2/99 -0500, Kevin M. Kelly wrote:
>>>>Be assured that you are not alone.  I must admit that (a few steps behind
>>>>ICANN) I find it increasingly difficult to see credible representation for
>>>>the non-commercial domain holders.
>>
>>> As nearly as I can tell, the stance being taken by some folks is that
ICANN
>>> should, somehow, provide a position for non-commercial holders, without
>>> there being any credible group to occupy the space.
>>
>>> Where is the credible group that represents non-commercial domain holders?
>>
>>Do you feel that the ISOC proposal and the group that supported it is
>>not 'a credible group that represents non-commercial domain holders'?
>>If so, why?
>
>Not without the modifications endorced by Mueller and ACM.
>
>ISOC has too many commercial interests that are involved in this also
>to be said to be totally impartial.  There are potential conflicts of
>interest that need to be resolved with regards to the ISOC, and as
>such, they should not be the dominating force behind the NCDNHC.
>
>
>
>--
>William X. Walsh william@dso.net
>General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>Fax:(209) 671-7934
>
>The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go 
>crying to every time you have something 
>to whimper about.
>
>