[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IFWP] RE: ???
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 18:01:26 +0200
- From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: [IFWP] RE: ???
In message <email@example.com>, "Roeland M.J. Meyer" wri
> At 06:09 AM 3/17/99 +0100, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >You wrote:
> >> I'm still going over the evidence, but ICANN internalizing the DNSO kind
> >> of shoots DNSO.ORG in both feet.
Right. And? As in so what?
> >I'm not sure to understand this.
> >Wasn't there general consensus that the DNSO should be part of ICANN and not
> >separately incorporated?
> That's exactly the point. ICAN took NONE of the DNSO
> application. Rather, they assembled their own from the pieces.
As a DNSO.ORG Drafting Team member I'd have liked to see the Paris
draft succeed but then this is better than the K*nt, Amadeu and their
> That kind of does-in the DNSO.ORG as they was their reason for
There was no DNSO.ORG. It seized to exist end of December 1998 when it
changed to the K*nt and Amadeu's playground.
> If ICANN now takes over the DNSO.ORG web-site then what does that
> say to the rest? IMHO, that would a dumber move, on ICANN's part,
> then I would normally give them credit for.
Who cares what happens to a web site of a non existing organization?
> It seems to me that impartiality is exactly what ICANN is striving
> for, with that move.
I do agree. It's obivous we can't do it ourselves so they have to do it
for us. Whether we like the result is a separate matter. Whether the
K*nt wanted this in the first place, another.
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse\ / Swakopmund State Hospital
<el@lisse.NA> * | Resident Medical Officer
Private Bag 5004 \ / +264 81 1246733 (c) 64 461005(h) 461004(f)
Swakopmund, Namibia ;____/ Domain Coordinator for NA-DOM (el108)
- RE: ???
- From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>