No Consensus for: Re: [IFWP] ICANN Dispatch from Singapore - 4 March 99

[jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Sean and all,

  I changed the title to illustrate plainly that there is has never been
even a tiny consensus for any of the ICANN decision stated in this
"Dispatch", as we all already know.  BTW this is about the forth
such announcement sent thus far.

Sean Garrett wrote:

> The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Initial Board of Directors Determines Guidelines at Singapore Meeting
>
> Summary
>
> SINGAPORE, March 4, 1999 -- The initial Board of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) moved forward today on two important decisions:  determining the requirements for accreditation of domain name registrars in the .com, .net and .org top-level domains (TLDs); and determining the structure for its Domain Name Supporting Organization.
>
> Meeting in Singapore, the Board adopted a domain name registrar accreditation policy, with changes from the draft guidelines reflecting public comments that the guidelines should be as lightweight as possible.
>
> The Board also adopted the attached document outlining the concepts and structure on which the Domain Name Supporting Organization will be based.
>
> The DNSO will be an advisory group within ICANN responsible for recommending policies concerning the Domain Name System and for selecting three of ICANN,s 19 directors.  The Board considered a wide range of comments and views, including two applications for DNSO recognition, and concluded that the most appropriate approach would be to use the best features of both in the new document.
>
> “We made some major progress today towards creating a truly competitive environment in the .com, .net and .org domain naming system,” said Esther Dyson, Interim Chairman of ICANN’s Initial Board of Directors. “We also showed the consensus process in operation by changing our initial proposals to reflect the community’s feedback.”
>
> The Board also adopted a conflict-of-interest policy and established procedures for reconsideration of ICANN decisions.
> The Board held its meeting in Singapore in conjunction with the annual APRICOT conference, an Asia-Pacific-wide Internet conference, reflecting ICANN,s international nature.
>
> Adoption of Registrar Accreditation Guidelines
>
> The Board adopted a policy by which competing registrars will be accredited to process registrations in the .com, .org, and .net generic top level domains.
>
> The Board also approved accompanying contracts, and directed the ICANN President to implement the policy and begin accepting registrar applications by Monday, March 15.
>
> The policy approved today reflects a number of changes reflecting public comment, including adjustments to make the requirements clearer and less burdensome, reduce uncertainty for registrars and registrants, strengthen data escrow provisions, and clarify the legal liabilities of registrants that license names to anonymous third parties.
>
> Creation of an ICANN Domain Name Supporting Organization (DNSO)
>
> The Board reviewed the two applications for recognition as the ICANN Domain Name Supporting Organization, along with written comments received and comments made at its public forum held in Singapore on March 3, 1999, including a document submitted in Singapore by the CENTR organization.
>
> The Board believes that it now possesses adequate information from the domain names community to proceed with the formation of a DNSO.
>
> While not accepting in full either of the proposals submitted, it has adopted a statement of DNSO formation concepts drawn from both proposals, the consensus principles identified in the CENTR document, and other comments.
>
> The Board has directed staff to draft proposed changes to the ICANN Bylaws to be publicly posted in advance of consideration by the Board.
>
> In taking this action, the Board believes that it is proceeding on the basis of a broad consensus within the domain names community regarding the DNSO.
>
> Other Actions
>
> The Board of Directors adopted a conflicts of interest policy and a reconsideration policy, as required by the ICANN bylaws.  The Board also discussed ongoing fundraising efforts, preliminary budget planning, and other operational matters.
>
> Domain Name Supporting Organization Formation Concepts
> March 4, 1999
>
> To be used by the ICANN staff in preparation of draft Bylaw provisions detailing the structure and mechanisms of the Domain Name Supporting Organization.
>
> The Role of the DNSO
>
> The Domain Name Supporting Organization (&DNSO8) should be a consensus-based policy advisory body within ICANN.
>
> General Participation in the DNSO
>
> The DNSO structure should include a General Assembly open to any individual or entity willing to contribute effort to the work of the DNSO.
>
> Constituency Groups Within the DNSO
>
> The DNSO structure should include self-organized constituency groups of organizations and/or individuals with interest and expertise in DNSO matters.  The initial DNSO constituency groups should be (in alphabetical order):
>
> ccTLD registries
> Commercial and business entities gTLD registries
> ISPs and connectivity providers
> Non-commercial domain name holders
> Registrars
> Trademark, intellectual property, anti-counterfeiting interests
>
> Individual domain name holders should be able to participate in constituencies for which they qualify.
>
> There should be no limitation on the number of constituency groups in which an entity may participate, as participants may have interests that align with multiple constituency groups.  However, given the consensus that the DNSO should represent a broad and diverse range of interests, no more than one employee of any one organization should be permitted to serve on the Names Council at one time.
>
> Self-organized groups other than the initial groups set forth above may be recognized by the ICANN Board as DNSO constituency groups upon a proper showing pursuant to criteria to be determined.  The ICANN Board should periodically review the status of the constituency groups to determine whether all DNSO interests are adequately represented.
>
> The Names Council
>
> The Names Council should act as a steering committee for the DNSO and should be responsible for managing consensus and making recommendations to the ICANN Board regarding TLDs, including operation, assignment and management of the domain name system and other related subjects.
>
> The Names Council should be elected by the DNSO constituency groups, each of which will elect three Names Council members.
>
> Development of Substantive Recommendations
>
> The Names Council recommendations should be developed through a bottom-up process in which participants in the General Assembly take part.  Recommendations approved by a majority of the Names Council shall be forwarded to the ICANN Board, accompanied by expressions of minority views (including explanations of the potential impact of a recommendation on a specific constituency or constituencies).
>
> Selection of ICANN Directors
>
> The DNSO Names Council should seek nominations from the General Assembly for individuals to serve on the ICANN Board.  The Names Council shall vote from among those nominees to select directors to be submitted to the ICANN Board of Directors for election under Article IV, Section 9(b) of the ICANN Bylaws.
>
> Open Processes
>
> The DNSO should be governed by provisions for open and transparent non-discriminatory processes that are at least comparable with those that apply to the ICANN Board.  Further provisions may be established to ensure that the full record of the formation of each recommendation is available.
>
> Funding
>
> Administrative and operational costs of the DNSO should be funded by DNSO participants in a manner to be determined.
>
> # # #
>
> __
> http://www.go.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Get your Free GO Network Email address at http://mail.go.com

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208