[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:14:04 -0800
- From: Kent Crispin <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 05:58:02PM -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
> >Absolutely. Iperdome has no more right to the name that AT&T.
> >CORE has no more right to .web than IOD does, which is to say, none.
> Well, this is where we're going to have to agree to disagree, and
> see what ICANN does with the situation, presuming that they get
> that far.
> And, of course, hope that this gets worked out fairly and stays out
> of court.
It will end up fairly, just like it did before; and it will probably
still end up in court, just like it did before; and the result will
be roughly the same.
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited",
firstname.lastname@example.org the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55