[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DNSO / ICANN Funding Model Paper, Version 0.1



On Mon, Nov 16, 1998 at 03:01:09PM -0500, cgomes@internic.net wrote:
> Kent,
> 
> I probably should have worded my questions more carefully.
> I intended them to generate discussion, not to criticize
> what was done.  Should SOs fund ICANN?  I think not.  Should
> SOs be self-funded?  I think so.  Should registries fund
> ICANN?  I think so.
> 
> What are your thoughts on these questions?

I am in total agreement with you, and indeed, I think that is the 
common understanding at this point.  In the paper we were bending 
over backwards to avoid any assumptions about such things, though.  

-- 
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair			"No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com			the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44  61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html