Re: [tor-udrp] Re: [council] UDRP Review Task Force Selected
> From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>
> The Chairs are non-voting.
So what ?
You do not answer my question, neither address the problem I raise.
ccTLD NC rep
> >>> Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr> 08/29/01 04:15PM >>>
> > From: "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>
> > To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com>,
> > "'firstname.lastname@example.org'"
> > <email@example.com>
> > Subject: [council] UDRP Review Task Force Selected
> > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:21:15 -0500
> > The Task Force was selected by Milton and I yesterday.
> > There were only three areas where we had more than one nominee -
> > Complainant, ADR expert, and academic expert. Given that the majority of
> > the nominees in other categories were from North America, and given that we
> > had excellent nominees in these categories from outside North America, we
> > eliminated any North American nominees in these categories and selected from
> > there. Fortunately, the ccTLDs provided three geographical diverse nominees
> > so we chose the one form Africa since we did not otherwise have such a
> > nominee.
> > Once I accumulate their emails, I will forward them to the Secretariat and
> > ask that she create an email group for us so that I can notify the selected
> > individuals and we can begin discussions.
> > <<UDRP Nominees.DOC>>
> I had some personal difficulties to be on line, it is a little
> in late, I am sorry.
> Once I decoded the format I do not read, and completed with e-mails,
> I get 20 persons plus
> Chairs: firstname.lastname@example.org
> I have two observations:
> 1. shall I add you as Chair and Milton as well ? Why then 2 candidates
> from 2 constituencies when ccTLD were refused more than one seat
> (bringing people from 3 continents)?
> 2. the simple arithmetics is:
> 16 - NA, 14 NA plus two Chairs
> 3 - EU
> 1 - LAC
> 1 - AF
> 1 - AP
> 3. how many representatives are from countries with Roman law
> (as opposed to case law ?), or from countries not using case law ?
> I am not a lawyer, but as mathematician I wish express here my
> strongest objections as to representation of this TF.
> The terms of reference appears without problem, but the outcome does.
> Elisabeth Porteneuve
> ccTLD NC rep
> Business Constituency, Sarah Deutsch (NA) <email@example.com>
> ccTLD Constituency, Neil Duncan Dundas (AF) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> gTLD Constituency, Jeff Neuman (NA) <Jeff.Neuman@NeuLevel.com>
> IP Constituency, J. Scott Evans (NA) <email@example.com>
> ISP Constituency, Antonio Harris (LAC) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> NCDNH Constituency, Michael Froomkin (NA) <email@example.com>
> Registrar Constituency Michael Palage (NA) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Complainant (or representative), Katrina Burchell (EU) <Katrina.Burchell@unilever.com>
> CPR Panelist, M. Scott Donahey (NA) <email@example.com>
> CPR Provider, F. Peter Phillips (NA) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> eResolution Panelist, Ethan Katsh (NA) <email@example.com>
> eResolution Provider, Dr. Joelle Thibault (NA) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> NAF Panelist, James A. Carmody (NA) <email@example.com>
> NAF Provider, Tim Cole (NA) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Respondent (or representative), John Berryhill (NA) <email@example.com>
> WIPO Panelist, Maxim Waldbaum (NA) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> WIPO Provider, Erik Wilbers (EU) <email@example.com>
> GA Member, Dan Steinberg (NA) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Independent ADR expert, Joon Hyung Hong (AP) <email@example.com>
> Independent academic expert, Graeme Dinwoodie (EU) <firstname.lastname@example.org>