[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [registrars] Conference call? on IPC proposals
i would have to agreee with lauren here. michael has bee an integral part of
working group and can add significant insight to the conference
----- Original Message -----
From: Lauren Gaviser <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Timothy Denton <email@example.com>
Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Conference call? on IPC proposals
> Tim -- I'll be available for the call, although I think it makes sense to
> Michael Palage on the call as well. I see that he can't make it then, so
> might want to pick another time.
> Michael: what time works for you?
> Thanks for organizing Tim.
> Timothy Denton wrote:
> > Registrars:
> > I propose a conference call next Tuesday at 4pm EST, on the subject of
> > domain name expansion/protections for TM holders, and so forth. The
> > rationale for 4pm is that it will allow early risers on the Pacific rim
> > join in.
> > There has been considerable interest expressed in the idea of a
> > teleconference, and we shall have it.
> > If people would indicate their availability for this call at this
> > time, we could plan the number of lines more effectively.
> > Thank you.
> > TMD
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 5:26 PM
> > To: Lauren Gaviser
> > Cc: Timothy Denton; email@example.com
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] Conference call? on IPC proposals
> > At 11:14 19-04-2000 -0500, Lauren Gaviser wrote:
> > >I support the idea of having a conference call on this subject,
> > >would
> > >like to see it scheduled for a different time given that Passover
> > >tonight, and then it's Good Friday.
> > We would concur on the timing -- and thanks to Tucows. BobC