[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[registrars] Re: ICANN/wg-b/Position Paper
At 16:05 19-11-1999 +0900, Hikoh Okuda wrote:
>By extention, if a registrar refused to register any
>name that contains famous trademarks in it, the potential registrant would be
>unable to prevail in litigation against the registrar.
>We believe that this court case would favorably affect to implement preemptive
Dear Mr. Okuda:
I was surprised this week to go to a plumbing supply store in the city of
Orange, CA, (specializing in irrigation for lawns and gardens, drip
irrigation, etc.) and say a sign saying "We reserve the right to refuse
service to anyone". It's been years since I've seen such, I thought it was
fraught with so much risk that no one would make such a public statement.
The 7Names case is certainly a move in the right direction. So are some of
the conditions of the U.S. Senate proposal.
P.S. I'm posting this Email to the Registrar Consistency mailing list.