RE: [registrars] Registrars code of conduct

["Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>]

We should begin by providing an overview of the code adopted previously as it took over a year to get us to that stage.  The discussion on this list has been about a voluntary code, which even in voluntary form seems not to be acceptable to a number of folks.  So, I think it's premature to get Dan Halloran involved and discuss how to make it binding under the RAA.  

I would support spending some agenda time on the voluntary code already developed.  As Bruce suggested this, he can decide what to do with the time.  I would recommend having one of the folks involved in the original drafting explain the current code for at least part of the time.

Regards, Elana

-----Original Message-----
From: ross@tucows.com 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Paul Westley
Cc: Tim Ruiz; Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au; Registrars@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [registrars] Registrars code of conduct


On 6/16/2003 9:22 AM Paul Westley noted that:

> 
> I believe a code of practice for registrars is very topical and deserves 
> 30 minutes of our time. Does anyone else agree with me (apart from Bruce 
> who has proposed it)?

Yes.

We should include in this discussion an analysis of what it would take 
to make such a document binding as outlined in 3.7.1 of the RAA. Dan 
Halloran would likely be the best to provide this overview.

                        -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an 
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/