RE: [registrars] Montreal meeting

["Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.com>]

Actually, I was not suggesting "paid slots" at all.

Rather that if a Registry felt they had something important we needed to
know, that they should be accommodated if possible.

And I did not mean to intend this for "marketing" purposes.

Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Michael D. Palage
Cc: Rob Hall; Registrars List
Subject: Re: [registrars] Montreal meeting


On 6/6/2003 11:36 AM Michael D. Palage noted that:

> I think a proposed compromise could be as follow.

> P.S. Ross when TUCOWS was one of the sponsors of last years Amsterdam
> meeting, I did not find their presentation mind-numbing at all :-)

Actually if you recall, these were paid speaking slots for a pre-meeting
  evening of sales pitches. Precisely the type of arrangement that Rob
and I were discussing - I believe. Not sure if further compromise is
needed - I think we're all on the same page...




                        -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/