RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar

[Paul Stahura <stahura@enom.com>]

If Registrar 1 was 51% owned by entity A, and 49% by entity B
And Registrar 2 was 51% owned by entity B, and 49% by entity A
That would be two registrars/votes under the proposed bylaws, correct?

And if Registrar 1 was 51% owned by entity A, and 49% by entity B
And Registrar 2 was 51% owned by entity A, and 49% by entity C
That would be one registrar/vote, right?

I just want to make sure I understand it.

If that's it, I'm OK with it.  
One issue I foresee is to know/verify/disclose who owns what.
But I think we can deal with that.

Paul

PS 
extra credit question:
What if entity A is a registry?  

Just kidding...   :>)



-----Original Message-----
From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:rconnell@psi-japan.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Registrar Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar


At 09:24 AM 4/28/03 -0400, Elana Broitman wrote:
>"Where 51% or more of the voting shares of more than one Member are owned 
>by the same company, organization, or individual, including where a Member 
>holds such ownership in another Member, such Members shall be limited to 
>one (1) vote."
>
>what do others think?

Dear Elana:  Sounds good to me:-)   Regards, BobC



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Next to knowing when to seize an opportunity, the most important
thing in life is to know when to forego an advantage".

Disraeli