ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Draft Registrar Constituency Bylaws and Rules of Procedures

  • To: <registrars@dnso.org>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Draft Registrar Constituency Bylaws and Rules of Procedures
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:49:32 +1100
  • Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org
  • Thread-Index: AcLtm4/D9fQMzux1TYOPzusC4Ej/LAA3BuvQ
  • Thread-Topic: [registrars] Draft Registrar Constituency Bylaws and Rules of Procedures

As one continuously travelling at present on my way to Rio - I agree with the suggestion.
 
Regards,
Bruce
 



From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@digitel.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 5:09 PM
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: Registrars

elana & all..
 
given the current world situation & the significant "distractions " we are all facing currently,  as well as the fact that many will be traveling (with some difficulty i might add), to the upcoming ICANN meeting,
 
i would strongly recommend that we push back the timeline by one week .
 
i feel that comments &  suggestions should be taken thru April 8 in stead of the proposed April 1 ..as many will be traveling & meeting for well over 50% of the time period currently allowed for consideration  of the initial documents.
 
you have proposed many changes here and due to the global scope of this constituency, i feel it essential that ALL be provided with an equitable period of time to consider the documents & comment .
 
it would seem to me that "life will not" end if we add 7 days on the timeline
 
I would appreciate input from others on this request
 
respectfully submitted
 
ken stubbs
 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>