RE: [registrars] Motion

[Paul Westley <paul@internetters.co.uk>]

Is it possible to "third" or otherwise support this motion?

Paul Westley
Internetters
UK

At 04:59 PM 07/03/2003 -0500, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > I move that the constituency adopt the following position to
> > be subsequently communicated to the Council and Board
>
>I would happily second this.
>
>(And note for the record that this would be only the second time that I
>have publicly agreed with the esteemed representative from Network
>Solutions :)
>
>
>
>                        -rwr
>
>
>
>
>"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
>idiot."
>- Steven Wright
>
>Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> > [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Cute, Brian
> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:44 PM
> > To: 'Registrars@dnso.org'
> > Subject: [registrars] Motion
> >
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I move that the constituency adopt the following position to
> > be subsequently communicated to the Council and Board:
> >
> > "The Registrar Constituency proposes that ICANN eliminate the
> > Bulk WHOIS obligation since it: forces registrars to sell one
> > of their most valuable assets -- their entire customer list
> > -- to competitors and third parties; raises significant
> > privacy concerns for both registrants and registrars; and
> > harms consumers by contributing to unsolicitied marketing
> > campaigns." [end]
> >
> > Regards,
> > Brian
> >
> >