ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Motion


> I move that the constituency adopt the following position to 
> be subsequently communicated to the Council and Board

I would happily second this. 

(And note for the record that this would be only the second time that I
have publicly agreed with the esteemed representative from Network
Solutions :)



                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Cute, Brian
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:44 PM
> To: 'Registrars@dnso.org'
> Subject: [registrars] Motion
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> I move that the constituency adopt the following position to 
> be subsequently communicated to the Council and Board:
> 
> "The Registrar Constituency proposes that ICANN eliminate the 
> Bulk WHOIS obligation since it: forces registrars to sell one 
> of their most valuable assets -- their entire customer list 
> -- to competitors and third parties; raises significant 
> privacy concerns for both registrants and registrars; and 
> harms consumers by contributing to unsolicitied marketing 
> campaigns." [end]
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>