ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] PersonalNames.com


Rick,

> completely within our capabilities to clearly separate
> registrars from those that work for registries

That I don't think I agree with. If that is where this is leading then I
would object. I don't want this list, and the RC that represents my business
interests, captured by a group of mostly small registrars promoting their
own agenda.

Like it or not, there will never again be a clear distinction between
registrars and registries. We are all in this to make a profit. While I
don't want people involved on this list, or in the RC, that have intimate,
confidential knowledge of our businesses, I also don't want to preclude a
legitimate party from being able to participate.

I see no member of the RC or this list who I would object to participating.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Rick Wesson
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:09 AM
To: Ross Wm. Rader
Cc: registrars@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [registrars] PersonalNames.com




Ross,

I support this position. I believe that it is completely within our
capabilities to clearly separate registrars from those that work for
registries and to have this constituency membership only reflect
registrars intrests.

best,

-rick


On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:

> I would like to formally move that any representative of any ICANN
> recognized gTLD registry in the possession of or with access to registry
> Proprietary Information
>
(http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-apph-06mar01.htm#A-
> 3.1 in the case of GNR) or Registry Sensitive Information
>
(http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-apph-06mar01.htm#A-
> 3.2 also in the case of GNR) not be permitted to participate in this
> constituency at any level, in any capacity, for a period of one year since
> the last receipt of such information and that our by-laws be amended to
> reflect this.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ross Wm. Rader
> Tucows Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
> To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:26 AM
> Subject: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
>
>
> > As PersonalNames is now an ICANN accredited registrar they are eligible
to
> > subscribe to the registrar mailing list, and they have asked to be
added.
> To
> > date PersonalNames has not paid any membership dues so it is not
eligible
> to
> > vote in any constituency matters.
> >
> > Yesterday there were several posts asking the Registrar Executive
> Committee
> > to schedule a call with PersonalNames. Although the Executive Committee
> > stands ready to assist the constituency in this matter, I believe that
> some
> > dialogue between PersonalNames and the rest of the registrar community
> might
> > make any such call more productive.
> >
> > The only PersonalNames representative that has asked to join the
registrar
> > mailing list to date is Hakon Haugnes.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Michael D. Palage
> >
> >
> >
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>