RE: [registrars] UDRP Task Force

["Donny Simonton" <donny@intercosmos.com>]

I agree and WIPO is not very happy when the registrant makes contact
changes when a domain is in dispute.

Donny

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On
> Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: Michael D. Palage; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] UDRP Task Force
> 
> There should not be UDRPs in progress that the registrar of record is
not
> aware of.
> 
> Otherwise the registrant may attempt to make changes that will fail,
> contact
> CS, and they won't know what's going on. If we get notice we can
reflect
> it
> correctly in our DB so if the registrant, or someone acting on his
behalf,
> has questions we know the answer.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:39 AM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: [registrars] UDRP Task Force
> 
> 
> DO registrars have any input on the UDRP process. I know there have
been
> some comments that UDRP Providers should just obtain the information
from
> the Thick Registry Whois databases instead of contacting registrars
> individuals.
> 
> Is this a good or bad idea? Do registrars like getting notice of filed
> UDRP
> proceeding or would they prefer just to get a ruling to implement?
> 
> Any other comments or suggestions?
> 
> Mike
> 
>