Re: [registrars] proposals before whois TF

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

Hallo,

CSL GmbH can not support that recommendations for various 
reasons, without going into details :

1.) we find it a bad joke asking ICANN to collect fine-fees through a 
registry.

2.) The definition of a wrong address is not easy and missing (the 
world is not only USA), as a result it will be hard to provide evidence 
that registrar is failing in his duties. CSL asks claimants to provide 
the return message of postal offices as proof.

3.) Asking registrars to cancel the registration is not appropriate, 
who is paying for the domains, is it refunded? CSL for example 
makes the domain not usable by changing the NS to something like 
invalid-address. We just want to avoid that the same domains is re-
registered next day (with us or somebody else) again with wrong 
data ....

In total we would prefer a more liberal approach.
Showing the way how the procedure should be done is one thing,
carving in stone the procedure ICANN should follow in case of 
problems is not real.

siegfried

On 1 Oct 2002 at 10:34, Ken Stubbs wrote:

> 
> fellow registrars...ttached are some proposal being currently discussed in
> the whois TF which can significantly affect registrars .
> 
> i would STTRONGLY SUGGEST  that you review this paper and provide comments
> wher you find themn necessary..
> 
> in previous discussion both in teleconf and at amsterdam i indicated that
> the tone was changing with respect to whois compliance..
> 
> this is a concrette example of what i was referring to
> 
> best wishes
> 
> ken stubbs
>