RE: [registrars] Interim Transfer Proposal

["Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>]

At 10:02 AM 9/23/02 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>What I mean is that if you, as the gaining
>registrar, have received authorization from the registrant, then the
>lack of a response by the registrant to the losing registrar (who might
>use an english only notice) should not be a reason for denial - which is
>what the process that Chuck has put forward describes.

Dear Ross:  It was my intention to say that we would be disappointed if 
this provision was *not* included in the proposed procedures which would be 
disallowed.  We like this provision.  I believe you are saying the same 
thing.  Regards, BobC