RE: [registrars] ICANN Budget Approval

[Nikolaj Nyholm <nikolajn@ascio.com>]

Ascio has sent its approval.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au] 
> Sent: 20. juni 2002 04:26
> To: 'Bryan.Evans@algx.com'; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN Budget Approval
> 
> 
> 
> Melbourne IT has sent its approval to ICANN.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan Evans [mailto:bevans@interaccess.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 5:42 AM
> > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: [registrars] ICANN Budget Approval
> > 
> > 
> > Registrars,
> > 
> > We're going to be trying to contact each registrar 
> > individually, but this
> > list is pretty effective for contacting most registrars.
> > 
> > As you're aware, 2/3rds of the gTLD registrars (not the Registrars
> > Constituency, but individual registrars representing two 
> thirds of the
> > gTLD's
> > volume by domains registered) must approve the ICANN budget 
> > each year.   In
> > the past, only the Verisign Registrar (or the Verisign 
> > Registrar plus one
> > other big registrar) was required for this.  Now, market 
> > share in gTLD's is
> > spread enough that no two or three registrars can approve the 
> > ICANN budget
> > alone.
> > 
> > I am enclosing a letter composed by ICANN which explains the 
> > process, and
> > provides links to the final ICANN budget proposal.  In 
> > addition, it includes
> > a second page which must be signed by a representative of 
> > each registrar who
> > approves the budget and sent to ICANN.
> > 
> > We encourage you to do this immediately.  This budget must be 
> > approved by
> > the board in Bucharest.  If you have any questions for us, 
> > please feel free
> > to email us directly.
> > 
> > Yours truly,
> > 
> > ICANN Budget Committee, Registrar Representatives
> > Elana Broitman
> > Bryan Evans
> > Rob Hall
> > 
>