RE: [registrars] Comments on Verisign Wait List proposal

[Paul Stahura <stahura@enom.com>]

I'd also like to agree with Jim's motion.
Basically we all have various reasons for
agreeing or disagreeing with the WLS proposal.
I do know that the poll taken at Dulles showed, IMO,
consensus against the WLS proposal, which a vote
for or against Jim's motion will show ICANN.
I am having a hard time reconciling all the comments
into one brief document, but I am giving it my best shot.
I am not the most articulate.
Any help would be appreciated.


Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:16 PM
> To: Registrars Mail List
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Comments on Verisign Wait List proposal
> 
> 
> Jim can probably do a better job explaining his motion, but 
> as I understand
> it, this is a separate track designed to replace a "full 
> rebuttal/statement
> of concern/we fully agree" with a relatively minimal "we 
> reject this on the
> following grounds".
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -rwr
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.ca>
> To: "Registrars Mail List" <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:38 PM
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Comments on Verisign Wait List proposal
> 
> 
> > Aren't we putting the cart before the horse.
> >
> > I know that I, for one, would like to see the position 
> paper from the
> > drafting team, prior to voting on support for the WLS.
> >
> > Why the big rush ?  I thought Rick had a plan to publish 
> and then hold a
> > vote, and to publish the results of that vote with the 
> paper (with Yes
> votes
> > being signatories to the document).
> >
> > Frankly, this seems like the prudent course of action.  My objection
> earlier
> > was not to voting, but rather to using the word "concensus" 
> as opposed to
> "a
> > vote".  I think they can be two very different things.
> >
> > Additionally, it is exactly this drafting process where 
> more agreement can
> > be reached.  If we took a vote on everything before 
> producing position
> > papers to vote on, I suspect we would not get anywhere 
> close to a document
> > that many could live with.
> >
> > I mean, whats next ?  A motion from Bruce to support the 
> WLS, that we all
> > spend time discussing and voting on ?  Best to wait until 
> the paper is
> > drafted and know the entire story before the vote.
> >
> > Rob.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:08 PM
> > To: Jim Archer; Elana Broitman
> > Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] Comments on Verisign Wait List proposal
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Rick, if you see this, what is the next procedure for moving the
> > resolution
> > > I proposed to a vote?
> >
> > I'm not Rick, but I'm guessing that a second for the 
> resolution must be
> > obtained, a discussion of the resolution and then a vote.
> >
> > In the interests of moving to a discussion, I'd be happy to 
> second the
> > resolution unless there are further amendments forthcoming.
> >
> > No well thought out resolution should die for lack of a 
> second, let's wait
> > to kill it until the discussion phase ;)
> >
> > -rwr
> >
> >
> >
>