RE: [registrars] next step

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

On 5 Jan 2002 at 13:19, Paul Stahura wrote:

> Siegfried,
> 
> Questions:
> 1) I assume you mean during the 45-day grace period, Correct?
yes

> 2) I assume the original registrant would get a piece of the revenue
> generated, correct?
its up to the registrars to define how much and where the money goes.

and BTW the system could include the other TLD, not only com - net.

all together its an alternative. You know and I know that all the 
emails protesting against Veri$ign are usless and a waste of time.
(makes you feel good because you protestet, that's all)

The only reality is to do something, not (only) to discuss.

siegfried

> 
> Wondering,
> Paul
> eNom, Inc.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Siegfried Langenbach [mailto:svl@nrw.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:06 AM
> > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: [registrars] next step
> > 
> > 
> > Hallo,
> > 
> > considering my last posting (few minutes ago)
> > it seems to me that NSI as the biggest registrar does not need the 
> > WLS...and...
> > 
> > ...those willing to find a neutral company and have an agreement
> > together could have their own WLS.
> > 
> > Example:
> > 1.) Registrar A and B join the "registrars WLS" call it "R".
> > 2.) Registrar B is the sponsoring registrar for domain "D"
> > 3.) Registrar A has an subscriber for "D" and register that at "R" 
> > 4.) the owner of "D" does not renew the domain within X days after 
> > renewal date.
> > 5.) Instead of "B" deleting "D" it performs an ownerchange.
> > 
> > obviously some basic question are still not resolved
> > 
> > siegfried
> > 
>