| [registrars] ICANN DNSO Budget & Its impact on the Registrar Constituancy
 Fellow Registrars.... In the Names Council meeting Today i Voted against a 
request to have ICANN fund approx $170,000 of the DNSO budget for the next 
year. As you are all well aware, a substantial amount of the 
ICANN budget is funded thru assessments on the registrar constituency (approx 
50%).  This means that of any increase in the ICANN budget, 50 cents of 
each dollar is assessed to the Registrars.  Each constituency should pay its fair share of the DNSO 
operation and this proposal would pass a substantial burden from the other 
constituencies over to our constituency and I do not feel this is 
appropriate.  In my opinion, ICANN staff supported my position as 
well and I would not expect the proposal to transfer this burden to be 
approved. Today's actions only reinforces my concerns that there may 
be attempts this year to impose additional financial burdens for ICANN 
operations & outreach (i.e. at large outreach) on us and we Registrars need 
to be even more pro-active.  The impact on the registrars could be very 
significant if we do not  work hard and organize for increased 
participation by ALL of our members in lobbying & advocating within ICANN to 
prevent this from happening. Some constituencies (i.e. Business & Non-Commercial) 
have the  attitude that they support ICANN thru the purchase of domain 
names thru us and we registrars should use the funds that we collect from the 
end user to support ICANN and that they should not be asked to fund ICANN thru 
their constituencies. I disagree strongly with this view. We are not allowed to pass these ICANN assessments thru to 
our customers as additional charges (as Telco's are currently allowed to do) and 
as such are forced in many cases to "eat" these 
expenses.   It is for exactly the reasons I point out above that ALL 
the members of the constituency need to be aware of these issues and work hard 
to keep us from being additionally burdened.   Ken Stubbs 
 |