RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments

["Antony Van Couvering" <avc@nameengine.com>]

I think our account is current, but I may be wrong -- and that indeed may be the source of the problem.  Thanks for looking into it.

Antony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:07 AM
> To: Antony Van Couvering
> Cc: Nikolaj Nyholm; Registrars List
> Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments 
> 
> 
> 
> Antony,
> 
> sorry, i'm still at the ietf, so i'm not more ontop of things.
> I'll find out about your ballot; it would not have been sent 
> to bruce ;-) 
> 
> balots were only sent to members with current accounts with the
> constituency, you may want to find your canceled check to 
> icann for your
> registrar constituency fees, it will help us verify the status of
> NameEngine.
> 
> thanks,
> 
>  -rick
>  
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> 
> > Nikolaj,
> > 
> > If you are correct, then someone has foolishly relied on 
> the telegraphic style of the press to make decisions which 
> actually require finer definitions.  VeriSign has agreed to 
> acquire NameEngine, but all the formalities are not yet 
> complete.  Furthermore, NameEngine was not given any notice 
> about changes in balloting.  
> > 
> > I await a response from a responsible member of the 
> constituency.  If NameEngine's ballot has been sent to Bruce, 
> the vote is improper.
> > 
> > Antony
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nikolaj Nyholm [mailto:nikolajn@ascio.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:02 AM
> > > To: Antony Van Couvering; 'Registrars List'
> > > Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Dear Tony,
> > > 
> > > Your's was sent to Bruce. ;)
> > > 
> > > Best
> > > Nikolaj
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Antony Van Couvering [mailto:avc@nameengine.com] 
> > > > Sent: 12. december 2001 14:58
> > > > To: Nikolaj Nyholm; Registrars List
> > > > Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > And I was quite surprised to see Nikolaj's note, but no 
> > > > ballot.  Have all the ballots been sent?  It is irregular 
> > > > that some registrars have received ballots while other can 
> > > > only read comments about them. 
> > > > 
> > > > Antony
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Nikolaj Nyholm [mailto:nikolajn@ascio.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 AM
> > > > > To: 'Registrars List'
> > > > > Subject: [registrars] by-law ammendments 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Dear Exec. Committee,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I was quite surprised to receive our ballot this morning - I 
> > > > > do not believe
> > > > > that it has been disclosed that we were voting on 
> anything but NC
> > > > > representatives.
> > > > > I do not believe that there has been a formal process of 
> > > > > placing other votes
> > > > > on the agenda - or am I not following list traffic 
> closely enough?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I kindly ask the exec. committee to more directly 
> state impacts of
> > > > > ammendments. 
> > > > > For example, it is unclear to me what I am approve or 
> > > > > disapproving in item
> > > > > 4. What is the current practice?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thank you in advance.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Kindest regards
> > > > > Nikolaj Nyholm
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
>