ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] XFER Update


Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> 

> The alternative is that Tucows (and other registrars presumably) is going to
> have to go out and spend the extra $$ to get two more fresh accreditations
> from ICANN to ensure that we are on an even keel with Verisign/Network
> Solutions. This certainly isn't the most elegant answer,

I think what you are suggesting would really be a "sham" and
not really the same as a registrar buying another 
registrar.  (Of course along the same lines an existing
registrar buying a registrar that was setup just for
that "purchase" would also be a sham.)  

I guess it's somewhat reasonable that if 3 entities are 
always going to have to vote as 1, that that should be 
considered 1 vote. 

On the other hand, I've seen cases (in Real Estate
Condos, to name just one example) where owners of
multiple units do get multiple votes.  

Also, keep in mind that the value of domain registration businesses 
would seem to be higher if a purchase of an existing
business comes with an extra vote. 

Larry Erlich

 but unless we can
> effectively deal with the inequity that this creates via policy, then we
> will have to address it practically.
> 
> New MdR topic?
> 
> -rwr

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich@DomainRegistry.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>