<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] FW:
At 08:48 AM 9/15/01 +0530, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
>got this email from someone ..... as some of you may have .....
Dear Bhavin: It's so stupid. I'm sure he billed his customer plenty for
this dumb communication. "Business.biz" is designated for NeuLevel under
Appendix X:-(
Personal regards, BobC
>-----Original Message-----
>From: TEAL EMLYN [mailto:TEAL@law.com]
>Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:50 PM
>To: Sales@GoDaddy.com; support@itsyourdomain.com; legal@directnic.com;
>staff@registrars.com; comments@mrdomreg.com; human@nameengine.com;
>info@namescout.com
>Cc: sales@namesecure.com; comments@namesecure.com; info@NameTree.com;
>web-comments@networksolutions.com; contact@nAAme.com;
>connelly@psi-usa.com; support@000domains.com; info@RegistrationTek.com
>Subject:
>
>
>Dear Sir or Madam:
>We represent " BUSINESS.BIZ," an entertainment group that is the
>owner of the ranking trademark rights (USPTO Serial Number 78030898)
>for this exact terminology including but not limited to the
>corresponding identical domain name.
>BUSINESS.BIZ has submitted an "IP claim" to NeuLevel, Inc. for its
>intellectual property rights to take advantage of the Dot Biz claim
>notification procedure. Despite the existing IP claim procedure for
>protection of such property rights, it appears they are insufficient
>to assure protection of our client's existing and highly valuable
>trademark, trade name, common law and domain name rights.
>We hereby write to give you formal notice, as a Dot Biz registrar of
>BUSINESS.BIZ's valuable and enforceable rights in the mark
>identified herein, that we demand that you respect the aforementioned
>trademark, trade name, common law, and domain name rights by refusing
>domain name registration to any other party or parties of the
>identical domain name that that is our registered trademark, trade
>name, common law and domain name. Our client is exclusively entitled
>to the domain name identified in this letter.
>Your cooperation is expected and your failure to satisfy this demand
>will be viewed by our client as a deliberate violation of its
>trademark rights.
>Any attempt to protect our client's rights by use of the IP claim or
>domain name registration procedures, or otherwise, shall not limit
>your obligation to comply with this demand or our client's right to
>take action to enforce this demand.
>We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
>questions, please let us know.
>Sincerely,
>
>J D Sallen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Sent by Law Mail
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|