Re: [registrars] Proposals for Rules for the Association

["Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>]

At 11:44 PM 8/21/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>Not my point at all - this thread is now running dangerously close to
>becoming what I feared most. Rather than discussing substantive points of
>difference and agreement we are being quickly sucked into a discourse on the
>semantics of Robert's Rules (the other Rob ;).

Dear Ross:  I do not consider Roberts Rules of Order merely 
"semantics".  IMO, you are further compounding the problem by this kind of 
semantics:-)

BobC