Re: [registrars] Draft Letter

["Werner Staub (CORE Secretariat)" <secretariat@corenic.org>]

Hi Mike,

Great job. I know everything cannot be said in a letter, but
I find that the following facts ought to be stated:

1) The transfer procedure has been designed *by* Verisign, 
   including all the rules shown in the letter.

2) If the registry were not related to the largest registrar, 
   it would have reformed the transfer procedure rather than
   allowing a registrar to unilaterally deform it.

3) The remedies proposed by Verisign are designed to further
   increase the cost of transfers as a barrier against competition.

4) We ask Verisign to discontinue the auto-nack methods *immediately*,
   All registrars are willing to work on improving the transfer 
   framework with low cost and high security as objectives.

Regards,

Werner


"Michael D. Palage" a *crit :
> 
> Attached please find the proposed letter to Stuart drafted in accordance
> with the discussion during yesterday's teleconference and which the
> Constituency proposes sending to ICANN. I believe that the letter achieves
> the objectives stated in our teleconference yesterday. Please provide any
> comments to the letter during the next 24 hours so that I can submit it to
> ICANN ASAP. This letter is important to the ongoing consensus building
> efforts that the Constituency has undertaken and I urge all member to review
> this letter closely.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Michael D. Palage
> 
>                             Name: Registrars-July24.doc
>    Registrars-July24.doc    Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
>                         Encoding: base64