Re: [registrars] Original Budget Committee Volunteers
Thank you Rob for that reminder.
As I recall, we wanted to have representatives of small and large
registrars. This would argue for one of the larger registrars to be
nominated to replace Bulk Register. I don't believe that we should exclude
any registrar from being nominated. Various companies are involved in
several constituencies and have always been. We simply need to know that
whoever is nominated will represent the interests of the registrar
----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Hall <email@example.com>
To: Michael D. Palage <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Original Budget Committee Volunteers
> At 11:03 AM 4/18/2001 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
> >The original nine volunteers (all sizes) were (alphabetical order):
> >BulkRegister, DomainBank, Domains.ca, e-names.org, InterAccess, Melbourne
> >IT, Names4ever, Register.com and TUCOWS.
> John T. from Dotster and myself from Domains.ca are still on the
> committee. I think we lost the rep from Bulk Register, if I am not
> Rob Hall voice (613) 768-5100
> President fax (613) 820-0777
> Momentous.ca Corp.
> firstname.lastname@example.org www.momentous.ca