ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Code of Coduct/Best Practices Debate


Agreed. Wasn't there a working group formed to study this issue? I vaguely
remember some conversations around this point over the past few months...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Erica Roberts
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:12 AM
> To: ross@tucows.com; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Code of Coduct/Best Practices Debate
>
>
> Perhps this is a good time to think again about the need for professional
> staff support.  In previous discussions, I think there has been general
> agreement on the need, but the constituency has never progressed
> discussion
> or agreed on any funding support model.
> While there are a range of funding models we could choose, for the sake of
> aadministrative simpicity, we could start by seeking constituncy agreement
> to bill each Registrar $US1000 to support professional staff.  Larger
> Registries should be invited to provide additional sponsorship and I think
> could confidently be expected to commit additional funding support.
>
> erica.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
> To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 5:55 AM
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Code of Coduct/Best Practices Debate
>
>
> > > Software, to keep track of all of
> > > the issues, and status of the issues, would be helpful
> > > given the resources. Ideas?
> >
> > I'd like to recommend an Apache based solution that capitalizes on the
> web's
> > capability to display minutes from meetings using HTML. ;)
> >
> > Seriously, as we discussed in LA, the service that we get from the
> > constituency is likely to fall short of our expectations until such time
> > that we move to a more "fee-for-service" model. This idea had a decent
> > degree of support, but I don't think that until such time that
> we actually
> > have the structure in place that it's fair to criticize anyone's efforts
> > (directly or indirectly). Seeing as we all have day jobs, it's a miracle
> > that we get anything done. Were it not for our coincidental
> self-interest,
> > we probably wouldn't.
> >
> > -rwr
> >
> >
> >
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>