ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign


I fear the time may have past, but the effort is still certainly worthwhile.
I would support an effort to revive Amadeu's earlier work to be presented to
the NC for ratification as a consensus policy.

-rwr

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Amadeu Abril i Abril
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 7:28 PM
> To: Robert F. Connelly
> Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
> Verisign
>
>
> "Robert F. Connelly" wrote:
> >
> > At 09:52 AM 4/2/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> >
> > >There are no ICANN policies concerning warehousing.
> >
>
> Well, my very last task as NC rep was to start a resolution on
> concrete language to implement the anti-warehousing language provided
> for in the ICANN Accreditation Agreement... but was then "sent" to the
> Board and I am afraid that NC never pursued that work.....
>
> Hope something could be done here ;-))
>
> Amadeu



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>