<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]
Me too.
----------------------------------
Ivan Vachovsky,
President
ABACUS America Inc. d.b.a. A+Net
Ste 880, 4660 La Jolla Village Dr.
San Diego, CA, 92122
(858) 558-8522 x 103
www.aplus.net Internet Services
www.websolo.com Affordable web hosting
www.names4ever.com Accredited Domain Registrar
www.paybutton.com Billing for e-commerce
www.server4me.com Server co-location
www.fiberia.com Free e-mail and web services
www.rodopi.com Billing software for IP services
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Tai (Dotster Inc)" <jtai@dotster.com>
To: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>; "Paul M. Kane"
<Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>; "Registrars List" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]
> I am in favor of such call as suggested
>
>
> JT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Elana Broitman
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:02 PM
> To: Paul M. Kane; Registrars List
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]
>
>
> I am available to join such a call. I would second one as soon as
possible,
> since many in the U.S. may be leaving for Australia soon.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul M. Kane <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>
> To: Registrars List <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 7:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]
>
>
> > In light of the substantive change of direction of the proposed
ICANN/NSI
> agreement and the relatively few Registrars who will be in Melbourne would
> it be an idea to
> > hold a tel conf
> >
> > May I invite your comments, both supporting comments and opposing
commnets
> must be substantive and may I draw your attention to section "D" of
> > http://www.icann.org/melbourne/proposed-verisign-agreements-topic.htm
> >
> > The NC will be discussing this issue on Sunday....
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement
> > > Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 10:49:04 -0500
> > > From: Larry Erlich <erlich@domainregistry.com>
> > > Organization: DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
> > > To: Erica Roberts <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
> > > CC: registrars@dnso.org
> > > References: <022201c0a538$a9e3bcc0$8dd4fea9@pcax10series>
> > >
> > > We are 100% against this, and we are planning
> > > to do whatever is necessary to prevent
> > > this from happening.
> > >
> > > We will be filing a formal objection
> > > which we will try and post to the list.
> > >
> > > Erica, below you said:
> > >
> > > "Since there has been no objection from the Registrars, it has been
> > > claimed that the draft agreement is supported by the Registrars."
> > >
> > > Who exactly has made this claim?
> > >
> > > Larry Erlich
> > >
> > > http://www.DomainRegistry.com
> > >
> > > Erica Roberts wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The proposed new ICANN/Verising Agreement is likely to be discussed
in
> many fora at the ICANN Melbourne meeting including the Names Council - see
> > > >
http://www.icann.org/melbourne/proposed-verisign-agreements-topic.htm
> > > >
> > > > Since there has been no objection from the Registrars, it has been
> claimed that the draft agreement is supported by the Registrars. However,
> to my knowledge t
> > > > Since this will impact most on Registrars, it would be useful if
this
> matter could be included in the agenda for discussion in Melb.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > erica
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > The proposed new ICANN/Verising Agreement is likely to be discussed
in
> > > > many fora at the ICANN Melbourne meeting including the Names
Council -
> > > > see
> > > >
http://www.icann.org/melbourne/proposed-verisign-agreements-topic.htm
> > > >
> > > > Since there has been no objection from the Registrars, it has been
> > > > claimed that the draft agreement is supported by the Registrars.
> > > > However, to my knowledge the Registrars Consistuency have not
> > > > established any position on this matter. In order to ensure that
the
> > > > Registrars constituency is appropriately represented in the matter,
I
> > > > would appreciate Registrar comments on the proposal.
> > > > Since this will impact most on Registrars, it would be useful if
this
> > > > matter could be included in the agenda for discussion in Melb.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > erica
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
> > > 215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich@DomainRegistry.com
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|