ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-whois] re-opening for public comments?


Title: Message
i think i heard (on the recording) that there were some hints as to the members of the implementation committee, which should possibly include the GA members of the TF, i will listen again tonight and make some notes.
 
abel
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-whois@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Sent: 19 December 2002 14:45
To: Ruchika Agrawal; nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [nc-whois] re-opening for public comments?

The official status is the report was received, or accepted by the NC. The comment site will be reopened. I had asked Glen to wait until I talked to Bruce Tonkin to be sure we were in agreement on the time frame. He hasn't been able to respond to me, so, it will be reopened probably tomorrow, and stay open until January 30, which is the date which the Implementation Working Group has to close it's work, as well.  We will then take the additional comments, and put forward another version of the policy recommendations and other recommendations for vote by the NC at the 2/20 meeting. That is what would then be forwarded to the Board.
 
Separately, we will also present the two issues reports at the end of January from both Kristy's and Ram's groups. These will also be presented to the NC on 2/20.
 
We are also asked to plan to close this TF. Provide a recommended new TOR to the NC for consideration for establishing a new TF. It was acknowledged that there is likely to be overlap in membership, but that is up to the constituencies to decide. There is the possibility of participation in that TF by the At Large.
 
This is taken from my notes and is what I have been trying to reach Bruce to verify before posting. He has been traveling. I'll talk to Glen further to verify that my notes are accurate in summarizing the outcome. Others on the call are welcome to comment on this as well.
 
We would plan a TF call the first week of January in any case. By then, Bruce will have been able to comment; Glen and I will have been able to consult using her minutes/my notes and any other input from the TF.
 
Marilyn
 
Marilyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Ruchika Agrawal [mailto:agrawal@epic.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:27 AM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-whois] re-opening for public comments?

What is the official status of our recommendations from the Amsterdam meeting? 

Thanks,
Ruchika

At 02:21 PM 12/19/2002 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
From what I understood in Amsterdam, we are supposed to accept more
public comments in the coming days and weeks, i.e., the public
comment site should be re-opened.

Am I mistaken?

Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler (mobile)        <roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>