ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-whois] [fwd] WHOIS Report Posted. (from: roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net)


FYI.  I hope I didn't cause any editorial screw-ups today.  If I
did, I hope that the bug-fixing process outlined in my message to
the council is acceptable, so we can sort out things quickly.

On a more general note, I think that this task force will have to
revisit a considerable part of its document-production "process"
before we create any further official documents.  It is, in my view,
not acceptable that various parts of a report (such "unimportant"
things like an impact analysis and the cost considerations, for
instance) have to be created in a rush by two or three individuals
working over a week-end.

Good night (and don't expect me to read my mail tomorrow),
-- 
Thomas Roessler	(mobile)	<roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net>




----- Forwarded message from Thomas Roessler <roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net> -----

From: Thomas Roessler <roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net>
To: council@dnso.org
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:38:43 +0100
Subject: WHOIS Report Posted.
Mail-Followup-To: council@dnso.org

The WHOIS Task Force's report is available at the following URL:

	<http://does-not-exist.net/final-report/>

The report will be posted by Glen to the DNSO's web site tomorrow
morning European time.

I'll leave any further official remarks to the co-chairs of the Task
Force.


One persional caveat from a relatively tired "editor" may be in
order, though: Since there was extremely little time for proper
review towards the end of the editing process, I can't rule out the
possibility of editorial errors and misunderstandings which may have
crept in concerning some of the less critical portions of the
report.

If this should have happened, I hope that we can work with the
secretariat to quickly fix any problems until very early next week.
Of course, the council would be informed about any such changes, and
they would be appropriately marked in the published version of the
report.

Note, however, that NO such changes are to be expected with respect
to the core of the report: Chapter 3, which contains the actual
recommendations.

Happy reading, and have a nice week-end.

-- 
Thomas Roessler	(mobile)	<roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net>

----- End forwarded message -----


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>