RE: [nc-whois] DRAFT accuracy section: state of play

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Folks, I am pulling out my notes from the Shanghai meeting with the Registrars. I am not sure that all of these elements do make consensus level. Can we make sure that the Registrars reps are weighing in here? 



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Metalitz [mailto:metalitz@iipa.com]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:58 PM
To: 'nc-whois@dnso.org'
Subject: [nc-whois] DRAFT accuracy section: state of play 


With aim of working to finalize language at our Monday teleconference, here
is the state of play on the accuracy section.  This is essentially the
mark-up circulated off the public list by Kristy on Tuesday 11/19,
incorporating a specific suggestion made by Karen (in the preamble) that had
not been incorporated by Kristy.    It retains Thomas' yellow markings
though no change in text has been suggested on these.  In item 8 it includes
alternative formulations proposed by Thomas and by me.  I am not asserting
that this text has been "agreed to," since I know there are a number of
outstanding questions, from Ken and perhaps others, but I think it
suummarizes where things stand and is the basic text which we should think
about over the weekend and try to finalize on our Monday call.  We have
diverted a lot of attention (and I think rather successfully) to the bulk
access section but I suggest it is time to bring this section to a
conclusion as well.   

Steve Metalitz

 <<Domain Names Whois TF nov 22 state of draft on accuracy sjm 112202.doc>>