DNSO Archives: [nc-whois]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-whois] Wesson on Whois Policy.

To: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
Subject: Re: [nc-whois] Wesson on Whois Policy.
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:35:19 +0100
Cc: nc-whois@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <0F25F91B59355E42846E57527F331EA94644B6@lganj0se6.lga.att.com>
Mail-Followup-To: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>,nc-whois@dnso.org
References: <0F25F91B59355E42846E57527F331EA94644B6@lganj0se6.lga.att.com>
Sender: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On 2002-11-23 08:14:51 -0500, Marilyn Cade wrote:

> I think we have all agreed that privacy and access are issues
> which are work to be done... 

Yes, of course.  Just in case there is a mis-understanding: That
excerpt was from an article by Rick Wesson, not by me.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>

References:
- RE: [nc-whois] Wesson on Whois Policy.
  - From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
- RE: [nc-whois] Wesson on Whois Policy.
  - From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>