RE: [nc-whois] WHOIS TF WG2 recommendations

[Steve Metalitz <metalitz@iipa.com>]

Marilyn,

 

In response to your request, I suggest the following as questions on which comment would be sought for this section:

 

(1)  Are there specific enforcement mechanisms that ICANN should employ to improve compliance with the provisions of existing agreements with gTLD registries and registrars regarding Whois data formats and elements? 

 

(2)  What steps would encourage migration of existing thin gTLD registries to a thick registry model?

 

(3)  What other elements should be included in a "voluntary program" to encourage Whois policies and practices among ccTLDs that are more consistent with those prevailing among gTLDs?  

 

Steve Metalitz 

-----Original Message-----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA [mailto:mcade@att.com]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:40 PM
To: NC-WHOIS (E-mail)
Subject: FW: [nc-whois] WHOIS TF WG2 recommendations

Ram's last communication with me indicated that this is the 'final' version. I'm reposting it to the group so that you can consider

any questions you might want to suggest for it. I believe he is on travel and may be back in a day or two... but have no verification of

that last point.  In any case, we will move ahead with this.

 

Regards, Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Mohan [mailto:rmohan@afilias.info]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:21 AM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] WHOIS TF WG2 recommendations

Dear Team Members:

Attached to this mail are the results of conversations and work done by Working Group 2 (Ram, Steve, Oscar, Laurence).

 

Comments are welcome -- we'll discuss this in more detail on our call today.

 

-Ram