[nc-whois] RE: attached word version of recommendations of WHOIS TF -- outreach to Registrars/Registries

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

Thanks for the further details Marilyn. I have blocked off the time and
am happy to lend any assistance that I can.



                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
http://www.byte.org/heathrow


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA [mailto:mcade@att.com] 
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:16 PM
> To: NC-WHOIS (E-mail); Ram Mohan (E-mail); Rick Wesson 
> (E-mail); Ross Rader (E-mail)
> Subject: attached word version of recommendations of WHOIS TF 
> -- outreach to Registrars/Registries
> 
> 
> 
> > >  <<WHOIS REC SUMMARY TO ICANN STAFF.doc>>
> Tim/Ram, in your enlistment of fellow registrars/registries 
> for the Tuesday [rescheduled from Monday] WHOIS TF call, the 
> attached might be helpful. The purpose of the call, as all 
> will remember, is to hear from some registrars and registries 
> re comments on the recommendations. We are of course working 
> in small teams to enhance the recommendations but this call 
> will give us some more direct feedback. Each of the teams has 
> been making progress and we will have short updates from 
> those with drafts, but not until we conclude the outreach 
> portion of the call: 11:00 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. US EST. 
> 
> Does anyone not have the bridge information? We have added in 
> about 20 ports, but if you think more are needed, let me and 
> Marie know. 
> 
> On feedback so far, the comment period is now closed. Please 
> be sure to have read all community inputs. in addition, we've 
> seen a couple of short but useful emails ready from Chuck 
> Gomes and Jeff Neuman, on their comments. I'll repost if 
> anyone missed those. 
> 
> I've also reinvited Ross and Rick to the call -- 
> separately--from Tim's other outreach to the Registrars,  
> since there were other technical questions related to the 
> IETF work which we can follow up on.. They may then be 
> wearing multiple "hats" on Tuesday's call.
> 
> Tony and I hope to have a response from Stuart on our request 
> to him regarding any staff discussions. 
> 
> Best regards, Marilyn and Tony
> 
>