RE: [nc-whois] Election Results - Welcome Tony and Marilyn as WHO IS Co-Chairs

["Sapiro, Miriam" <MSapiro@verisign.com>]

hi everyone - i have the url for the 300 but am having trouble opening it.
key issue though: tony and marilyn suggest we pass all other data on to our
"helpers" (agree we need a good word here!). we should do that with some
guidance, however.  to my recollection, we have not yet decided among
ourselves on how we will divide up the total (minus 300) among the 8 groups.
does anyone remember differently?  if i'm right, then i suppose the guidance
could be "we are still deciding most efficient way of dividing up review, so
at this point it is fyi to familiarize yourselves." welcome your insights.
cheers, miriam 

Miriam Sapiro
Director of International Policy

VeriSign, Inc.
1666 K Street, NW, Suite 410
Washington DC 20006
tel:    202-973-6600
fax:   202-466-9103
cell:  703-282-7117
email: msapiro@verisign.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA [mailto:mcade@att.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 8:05 PM
To: 'Paul M. Kane'; nc-whois@dnso.org; Philip Grabensee
Cc: 'Glen'; 'Antonio Harris'
Subject: RE: [nc-whois] Election Results - Welcome Tony and Marilyn as
WHO IS Co-Chairs


Paul, thanks for your posting.  Good to have a decision. We will all  miss
you, and I am sure all will want to tell you that personally!

Tony and I will have a chance to talk on Monday. In the meantime, I'll say
thanks for myself and note that we'll be a busy team for the next few weeks!

In the meantime, can we ask that you notify the full TF of your identified
additional participants (we need a name for that category, other than
observer, it seems to me), providing name, telephone, email; that will allow
Glen to set up the second list.  Send the names to Tony and me, and cc Glen.
[note her email above].   

A couple of folks were concerned about whether their colleagues would be put
in a second class communications category.  Speaking only for myself, I
would envision that there would be very few work items for the next few
weeks which would not be on the larger/expanded list.    I expect the
expanded list to be the default for communications for the most part... 

But in keeping with our commitment to first agree amongst ourselves,  Tony
and I will discuss to be sure we are in agreement, and we will post to the
group. Then you can all confirm your views on that.  

Individually, as the BC rep, I have BC participants to contribute next week
but need to finalize first.  Since not all constituencies/GA may be able to
contribute a second/third reader, should we look at dividing the work in
some way which reflects that?  

Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul M. Kane [mailto:Paul.Kane@reacto.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 9:19 AM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org; Philip Grabensee
Subject: [nc-whois] Election Results - Welcome Tony and Marilyn as WHOIS
Co-Chairs


Thank you to all who voted... the results are:

The following Constituencies voted:
ISPC, Registry, IP, NCDNHC, ccTLD, BC

The following Constituency did not vote:
Registrars ..... nor did the GA Chair

Of the Constituencies which voted it was unanimously in favour of
Antonio Harris (ISPC) and Marilyn Cade (BC) acting as co-Chairs of the
WHOIS Committee.

Congratulations to Marilyn and Tony, and good luck to you all.... you
have an important task before you.

It has been a real pleasure working with you all .....

Best regards,

Paul