Re: [nc-udrp] Fw: <bloombert.com> Domain Name Dispute]

["Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>]

John Berryhill has penned a very convincing account of why this seemingly
reasonable idea is in fact quite misguided if not outright dangerous (it
violates basic contract principles and can work substantial confusion and
injustice). I seem to have mislaid my copy -- John, could you send one to
this list please?

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Antonio Harris wrote:

> This would appear to be a reasonable request
> 
> > > Accordingly, we respectfully request that ICANN amend the UDRP to
> > > require registrars to "freeze" disputed domain names while they are
> > > pending decisions in order to avoid scenarios like this one, in which
> > > our client will be forced to incur additional expenses in preparing a
> > > new complaint and is experiencing undue delays in recovering the
> > > disputed domain name.
> > >

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's warm here.<--