RE: [nc-udrp] DRAFT summary to date

["Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>]

I tend to agree with Milton.

-----Original Message-----
From: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@syr.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:02 AM
To: MSD@tzmm.com; synthesis@videotron.ca
Cc: nc-udrp@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-udrp] DRAFT summary to date


Dan:
I prefer to minimize any explanatory text, and would perceive
the document not as a "survey instrument" as used in social
science, but as a set of bullet points that solicit relatively
free-form comments. I anticipate non-English speakers
having major trouble with your explanatory comments
(although your and others' generous offer to translate
might overcome that somewhat)

The only survey-like features I support are the ones at
the top concerning the identification of the commentor.

>>> Dan Steinberg <synthesis@videotron.ca> 10/15/01 08:04PM >>>
well, it looks like Scott and Dan are at opposite ends of the spectrum on
this one. What does everyone else think?  Hopefully there is some consensus
on the subject?