RE: [nc-transfer] FW: [GTLD-RC] Revised DRAFT NC resolution re WHOIS TF report

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I should clarify further. The WHOIS TF recommends limited policy changes for now on WHOIS, mostly enforcement; plus some RAA changes and changes in marketing uses of WHOIS data... and a much elongated work programme to be fulfilled by them or a similar body. THAT is very different than this TF. Let's keep the two respectfully separate.




-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:21 PM
To: nc-transfer@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [nc-transfer] FW: [GTLD-RC] Revised DRAFT NC resolution re
WHOIS TF report


> The following was a note posted by one of the gTLD Registry 
> Constituency reps to the Whois Task Force and I believe the 
> same comments are similarly applicable to our task force.

Request to all/Point of order...

If your constituency or its members wish to comment on the Transfers TF
efforts/work/process etc., I'd like to respectfully request that they do
so directly. 

Transfers and Whois are completely separate issues and we do no one a
service by treating them as one issue. I realize that no one is doing
this intentionally, but there is a dangerous perception emerging
nonetheless. The DNSO must devote time and attention to solving the
specific issues raised by both reports - it is likely that separate
solutions are in order. Creating the perception that the issues are "the
same" will only serve to prolong the resolution of both.

Thanks,


                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
http://www.byte.org/heathrow