ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-transfer]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-transfer] Fw: Latest Draft...


Ross has done an awesome job on this. I owe him the edited executive summary, and the users perspective. Dan, were you still going to contribute to me on that item? If so, please try to do so by either 10:00 a.m. this morning, or if not, then you have until around 8:30 p.m. /I'll be in the car/air on the long flights home.. to D.C. from 12-8:00 p.m.

Any edits have to be in to Ross by tonight. He and I will make one final walk through tomorrow a.m.

I do not expect to post Grant's resolution with this tomorrow, so you have more time, Grant... 

Jeff, we still expect submissions for the registry impact statement and the edits  promised on the appeals process. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:30 PM
To: nc-transfer@dnso.org
Cc: 'Dan Halloran'
Subject: [nc-transfer] Fw: Latest Draft...


Something snafu'ed with this post - it took me a bit to notice that for some
reason, it was never received by anyone. Apologies for the delay.


                       -rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
To: <nc-transfer@dnso.org>
Cc: "'Dan Halloran'" <halloran@icann.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 7:11 PM
Subject: Latest Draft...


> ...is attached.
>
> Still waiting for:
>
> - Registry Impact Analysis (Neuman)
> - User Impact Analysis (Cade/Steinberg)
> - Supporting Arguments (Rader)
> - Executive Summary (Cade)
> - Introduction to Policy Recommendations (Rader)
> - Explanation of Consensus/Support (Rader)
>
> Drop me a note if you have questions.
>
>                        -rwr
>
>
>
>
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
> idiot."
> - Steven Wright
>
> Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>