<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[nc-transfer] RE: Verisign WLS Proposal
Posted with permission of sender. Thanks, Dan, for your time in providing your views to the Transfer TF.
Marilyn Cade
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Kriwitsky [mailto:dan@mcwebber.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
> Subject: Verisign WLS Proposal
>
>
> Dear Marilyn Cade,
>
> Not only do I think the Verisign WLS proposal will lead to
> increased prices and a further monopoly over the domain name
> system by Verisign, but I also believe it may be considered
> an illegal lottery. Verisign's proposal, as I understand it,
> to sell a chance at purchasing an expired domain name carries
> with it all the elements of a lottery.
>
> - Prize
> - Chance
> - Consideration
>
> All three combine to make this an illegal lottery by most US
> state's definitions as well as the US Postal Service
> definition of a lottery or gambling. (Title 18, United States
> Code, Section 1302, the Postal Lottery Statute)
>
> The idea that Verisign will be able to exercise control over
> domain names registered during the time when they had
> monopoly control over the domain registration system is a
> step backward. Currently, market forces work just fine in the
> secondary market as demonstrated by services such as
> NameWinner.com. There is no need for anything except a
> uniform expiration time to be implemented for domain names
> not renewed.
>
>
> --
> Dan Kriwitsky
> http://www.4sarasota.com/
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|