Re: [nc-review] Draft interim report Review

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com>]

Philip,
Sorry for the delay, I have been away for two days.
I like the idea of the minority report: it has the additional advantage of 
pointing out what the disagreement was instead of leaving a vague "I don't 
like it".
Good idea!
Additionally, I believe that you expressed concisely the spirit of my 
objections in the additional viewpoints.
Roberto



>From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
>To: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>,        "Roberto Gaetano DNSO GA" 
><roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com>
>CC: "NC Review" <nc-review@dnso.org>
>Subject: [nc-review] Draft  interim report Review
>Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:42:19 +0200
>
>Milton and Roberto,
>I do not want to damn a whole report covering several issues because TF 
>members have reservations about some of the majority views on certain 
>issues. I have included all non-conflictual comments. In order to get task 
>force agreement to the report I propose adding a section for minority views 
>and to summarise your views as follows. Please let me have your support to 
>the report with this addition - and a reply today (Monday Oct 8)  would be 
>wonderful!.
>Philip.
>
>
>Minority viewpoints
>Two task force members had alternative opinions on certain points.
>
>GA Chair
>The representative of the GA believed the by-law requirement and practise 
>whereby the NC sanctions the election result of the GA chair should be 
>abolished.
>
>New constituencies
>The representative of the GA, while not dismissing the proposed criteria,  
>believed that that the creation of new constituencies should have no higher 
>burden than the creation of initial constituencies.
>The representative of the NCDNHC proposed the new criteria should be 
>applied retroactively to all constituencies, if they were to apply to new 
>ones.
>The representative of the NCDNHC proposed making the GA itself a DNSO 
>constituency to represent individuals.
>
>Consensus
>The representative of the GA preferred the term "working group consensus" 
>in place of "majority vote of the working group".
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp